Sunday

New Research Ethics Links

VA Research & Development Program & Resources

International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects

1991 INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ETHICAL REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES

VA Policies by Topic: Scroll Down for Research-Related Policies

Guided tour of HIPAA (training for Privacy Officers) from CITI/U Miami

University at Buffalo SUNY Human Subjects Protection Program

This is where the spreadsheet submission form came from. 

Human Subjects Assurance Training (web-based) from OHRP

In order to qualify for an Assurance, the OHRP strongly recommends that the Institutional Official complete Module 1. The Human Protections Administrator (Primary Contact) and IRB Chair should complete all three modules.

Childrens Hospital Los Angeles IRB-Good Conflict of Interest (financial) Policy and Forms

OHRP Related Links Page

AATCHB resources for Tribal IRBs

Excellent, detailed report of the Havasupai vs. U. Arizona case

Proposal Submission for IRB review Checklist/Guidelines

This site is a guide for researchers who wish to submit a protocol for IRB review

Suggested Guidelines for Writing a Research Protocol from the Western IRB (WIRB)

This is a good ref for someone who'd writing their first protocol. 

World Medical Association Medical Ethics Manual (including chapter on research ethics)

Human Subjects Resources from PRM&R and ARENA

FDA Laws and Regs

U of Minn IRB web site-Good guides

USC Training Guides

IRB Teaching Guide (PDF) (PPt)
Protecting Human Research Subjects. A Guide for Student Investigators (PDF)
Are You Conducting Reserach Using Human Subjects? A Guide for Principal Investigators
Reportable Events Lecture (PowerPoint) Presented By CHLA
Violating the Rights and Welfare of Research Subjects (PowerPoint) Presented By CHLA
Retrospective Studies and Case Reports (PowerPoint) Presented By CHLA
Is Your Project Human Subjects Research? A Guide for Investigators (Word) (PDF)
Tip Sheets
Glossary

The Illinois Whate Paper - Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects: Counteracting IRB "Mission Creep"

When is BSSR human subjects research?

Guidance from the NIH Ofc. of Behavioral & social Science Research

Bioethics Resources on the Web (from Georgetown)

Kennedy Institute Bioethics Info Resources (Georgetown)

President's Council on Bioethics

Southcentral Foundation (ALASKA) Research Page w/IRB forms

Tips: What If a Cooperative Extension Professional Must Work with Native American Institutional Review Boards?

Tips: What If a Cooperative Extension Professional Must Work with Native American Institutional Review Boards?

Website that’s designed with the prospective subject of human research in mind (http://www.getresearchsmart.org/)

Official NAGPRA Website

NYU Wagner IRB Initiative: online resource for educators and researchers in policy and management

Online-research-ethics list run by asb at cc.gatech.edu

Online Course in Bioethics

Ethics of Research on the Internet

Research Ethics Resources on the Internet

IRB Glossary from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC),

New Corasworks DPER Page

Old Sharepoint NARCH Page

2006 Course on Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research from the NIH Department of Clinical Bioethics (w/videocasts & slides)

CITI on HIPAA and Research

CDC Guidance on Research vs. non-Research

Good Courses on Human Research Protections and on HIPAA for Researchers from UCLA

AAMC-ORI Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Program for Academic Societies-Web-based resources

The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JERHRE) publishes empirical research and reviews of empirical literature on human research ethics.

National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown U.

Phoenix New Times 2004-05-27/Havasupai Case "Indian Givers"

When Two Tribes go to War (Havasupai case) Nature 430, 500-502(29 July 2004) | doi:10.1038/430500a; Published online 28 July 2004

Tribe blasts 'exploitation' of blood samples (Nootka case) Nature 420, 111 (14 November 2002) | doi: 10.1038/420111a

Proceedings and Other Materials (Slides, handouts, readings, etc) from the PRIM&R 2006 Annual HRPP Conference in Washington, DC

Great Resource! some presentation recordings and no passwords needed

PRIM&R 2006 Handout Center - PW=washington06

Site lists PDFs by Day of Conference, need password (PW) ot download/open the documents.   Password is "washington06"

Links Related to Conducting Responsible Research in Indian Country from the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center

Harvard Program on Ethical Issues in International Research

Cases and lots of great teaching material

Teaching the Course in Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans (RCRH) utilizing a Case Study Approach

by Dr. Stanley Korenman skorenman@mednet.ucla.edu 
310-794-1818; funded by ORI

http://bioethics.net/ Emphasis on Neuroscience & bioethics

Alden March Bioethics Institute (AMBI) is a multi-institutional bioethics research organization based at the Albany Medical College

NIH Human Subjects Research Policies and Procedures (618KB)

NHLBI Clinical Research Guide Consent Form Tools, Templates and Other Human Subject Protection Resources

Research on Human Specimens Brochure from NCI

NIAID PAge on Human Subjects, Clinical Research

Indigenous Peoples' Council on Biocolonialism

Educational Conference Call Series on Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Ethical Issues in Research

Jointly sponsored by:
Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) and the Tuskegee University National Center for Bioethics in Research and Health Care (the Bioethics Center)

Tuskegee University National Center for Bioethics in Research and Health Care

www.tuskegee.edu/bioethics

Institutional Review Boards (IRB) for Indian Health Research (Romero/Freeman Slide presentation)

Alliance for Human Research Protection

OHRP Draft Guidance on "Engagement" in Human Subjects Research

CDC Guidelines for Defining Public Health Research and Public Health Non-Research

NIH Offic for Human Subjects Research (OHSR) Information Sheets/Forms

IRB Member Training at NIH

Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRB)

financial conflicts of interest (COI) toolkit from FASEB

The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)

A national network of lay people and professionals dedicated to advancing responsible and ethical medical research practices, to minimizizing the risks associated with such endeavors and to ensuring that the human rights, dignity and welfare of human subjects are protected.  Perhaps somewhat over-skeptical of psychiatric pharmacotherapy.  

Aberdeen Area Tribal Chairmens' Health Board IRB Resources

RESEARCH ETHICS AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) RESOURCES FOR TRIBES AND RESEARCHERS
Resource for Tribes: How to Review Research to Benefit Tribal Communities including How to Build and Sustain a Tribal IRB
Resource for Researcher: How to Conduct Research in AI/AN communities

University of Minnesota Web-Based Instruction on Informed Consent

Friends Research Institute IRB Reviewer Forms

Very nice and easy to use templates for IRB members

Friends Research Institute IRB Submission Forms for Investigators

Very Nice & Simple forms, good for IHS use. 

American Educational Research Association (AERA) Working Group on Human Research Protections

The Social and Behavioral Sciences Working Group on Human Research Protections is an interdisciplinary group of scientists established to examine and suggest ways to enhance the protection of human subjects in the social and behavioral sciences.  The Working Group receives support for its activities from the National Institutes of Health's Office of Social and Behavioral Sciences Research.

NIH/CSR Resources for Applicants

NCAI Policy Research Center: Gathering Our Stories, Setting a Roadmap for the Future

Resources for tribal communities exploring and developing research and evaluation policies and procedures; Tribally-Driven Research Agenda;

National Congress of American Indians (NCAI)

NCI Participant's Guide to Informed Consent

http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/conducting/informed-consent-guide 

Online Ethics Center (OEC) at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)

Group Mentoring in Responsible Research Conduct from OEC/NAE

A modular sequence of activities in the responsible conduct of research for faculty, trainees and staff
These Web resources for exploration of issues in the responsible conduct of research among students, faculty, postdoctoral fellows and research staff have been greatly expanded under grant PHS-NIH# T15 AI07592 A Modular Short Course in Research Ethics.

PRIM&R Educational Handout Center Archive

2006 Password is "washington06"
2007 Password is "hrpp!07"

Family Health International (FHI) Research Ethics Training Curriculum for Community Representatives (RETC-CR)

FHI's Office of International Research Ethics (OIRE) has developed a dynamic and innovative curriculum to empower community representatives through training and education to act as a competent voice for research participants worldwide. Developed and field-tested in eight countries, the Research Ethics Training Curriculum for Community Representatives (RETC-CR) helps community representatives to understand the research process and their roles and responsibilities as partners of the research team. The Curriculum also explains the corresponding roles and responsibilities of Ethics Committees/IRBs and Researchers. The RETC-CR addresses universal principles of research ethics, informed consent, ethics committees and other important issues.  The RETC-CR was recipient of The 2005 Distinguished Award of the Society for Technical Communication.

Native Health Data Base

HSLIC Native American Health Information Services
Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center
MSC09 5100
1 University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
Phone: (505) 272-0664

FDA Device Advice

Device Advice is CDRH`s self-service site for medical device and radiation emitting product information. Device Advice is an interactive system for obtaining information concerning medical devices.

IND/IDE Contact Information

Questions about medical devices (other than gcp questions)
www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmastaf.html 
Manufacturer's assistance: 800-638-2041
Consumer assistance: 888-INFO-FDA
Questions about whether a product is subject to IDE regulations: call 240-276-4040
Questions about drug products (other than gcp questions)
301-827-4570
Druginfo@fda.hhs.gov 
Questions about whether a product is subject to IND regulations: call 301-827-4570
Questions about biologics (other than gcp questions)
301-827-2000
Octma@cber.fda.gov (consumer oriented)
Matt@cber.fda.gov (manufacturers's assistance)
Questions about whether a product is subject to IND regulations: call 301-827-2000

Good Clinical Practice in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials

Humanitarian Use Devices

OP-1 Putty- H020008

Part 1 - Approval Order
Part 2 - Summary of Safety and Probable Benefit
Part 3 - Professional Labeling
Part 4 - Patient Labeling
Other Consumer Information

H010002 - OP-1™ Implant-long bones

Approved Device Data Bases @ FDA

New Device Approvals that include some of the newest medical technology available.
Monthly listings of Premarket Notification [510(k)] and Premarket Approval (PMA) decisions
Information on Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) approvals
Searchable databases of devices previously approved for marketing or declared substantially equivalent to a legally marketed device.
Frequently asked questions about recently approved devices.

Havasupai article from Indian Country Today

Research Regulation in American Indian/Alaska Native Communities: Policy and Practice Considerations

By Puneet Chawla Sahota, posted at NCAIPRC.org

Special Thematic Issue: Participatory Ethics

Health Care Quality Improvement: Ethical and Regulatory Issues

Edited by Bruce Jennings, Mary Ann Baily, Melissa Bottrell, and Joanne Lynn, Hastings Center: This new edited volume is a collection of original papers providing in-depth discussion of important ethical and regulatory aspects of quality improvement.

Links to Resources from the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, Inc. (AAHRPP)

PRIMR Mentoring Toolkit

a comprehensive and culturally relevant human subjects training program for community members of the research team (promotores, interview and outreach workers, investigators)

pictures of medicinal plants

Over 30,000 pictures of medicinal plants from Pankaj Oudhia are available at Ecoport, now new pictures are available at these two database also. 

Ecoport

http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&Author=oudhia&AuthorWild=CO

Imagebank (UK)
http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/imagebank/search/Bresults.aspx?Bparam=Author&Bkey=Pankaj%20Oudhia

Discoverlife (USA)
http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20p?see=I_PAO

Free Online Course on Fundraising Planning

Free Online Course on Fundraising Planning 

The Foundation Center's new 
Introduction to Fundraising Planning < http://foundationcenter.org/getstarted/training/online/free_ifp_detail.jhtml > provides an overview of the process of strategically thinking through the components of a fundraising plan. The free online training course is designed to help students develop a fundraising plan that includes a variety of revenue sources for their organization, establish fundraising goals, choose funding partners, and prepare a fundraising calendar.  

Scientists Can Predict Psychotic Illness in up to 80 Percent of High-Risk Youth

Note the overlap with symptoms of drug abuse:

http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/jan2008/nimh-07.htm

Scientists Can Predict Psychotic Illness in up to 80 Percent of High-Risk Youth

Youth who are going to develop psychosis can be identified before their
illness becomes full-blown 35 percent of the time if they meet widely
accepted criteria for risk, but that figure rises to 65 to 80 percent if
they have certain combinations of risk factors, the largest study of its
kind has shown. Knowing what these combinations are can help scientists
predict who is likely to develop the illnesses within two to three years
with the same accuracy that other kinds of risk factors can predict
major medical diseases, such as diabetes.

Plans for studies to confirm the results, a necessary step before the
findings can be considered for use with patients in health-care
settings, are underway.

The research was conducted in youth with a median age of 16 and was
funded primarily by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), part
of the National Institutes of Health. Results were published in the
January 7, 2008, issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry by lead
researchers Tyrone D. Cannon, Ph.D., of the University of California Los
Angeles, and Robert Heinssen, Ph.D., of NIMH, with colleagues from seven
other research facilities.

The combinations of factors that predicted psychosis included:

*  deteriorating social functioning (for example, spending increasing
amounts of time alone in one's room, doing nothing);

*  a family history of psychosis combined with recent decline in ability
to function (such as a drop in grades not explained by other factors or
an unexplained withdrawal from extracurricular school activities);

*  increase in unusual thoughts (such as thinking that strangers'
conversations are about oneself);

*increase in suspicion/paranoia (such as suspicion of being followed);
and

*  past or current drug abuse.

"When teens have a dive in grades or drop out of the school band, and it
happens against a backdrop of family history of schizophrenia and recent
troubling changes in perception - like hearing nondistinct buzzing or
crackling sounds, or seeing fleeting images that disappear with a second
glance - more often than not it indicates that psychosis is fairly
imminent," Cannon said.

If participants had an unrealistic belief that they were being followed,
for example, but could be shown that their troubling thoughts were
unfounded, the researchers considered them as having a risk factor, but
not yet psychosis. But if the participants' sense of being followed
became unshakable, despite evidence to the contrary, or became
disabling, the researchers considered them as having crossed a threshold
to psychosis.

Research shows that intervention during the early stages of psychosis
improves outcomes, but it is not yet clear if even earlier intervention,
before a psychotic illness develops, is effective.

"Having this more accurate ability to measure who's likely to develop
psychosis will be a great asset. Identifying young people in need of
intervention is crucial, but the results of this research can help us do
more than that. It can eventually help us determine the most effective
time to intervene," said NIMH Director Thomas R. Insel, M.D.

Researchers from the facilities that conducted the study used similar
criteria and techniques to evaluate 291 high-risk youth, about three
times as many as had been evaluated in any previous study of this kind.
In addition to being smaller, earlier studies had used different
criteria and measuring techniques from one another, which clouded the
picture and resulted in only moderate accuracy in predicting psychotic
illness.

In this study, a total of 35 percent of participants with at least one
risk factor developed a psychotic illness within the 30-month study
timeframe. However, when researchers broke the data down further, they
found that the youth who had two or three additional risk factors
developed psychosis at a rate of 68 to 80 percent, depending on which
risk factors were combined.

A separate group of 134 healthy people with no known risk factors for
psychosis served as a control group, for comparison. None of them
developed a psychotic illness.

Researchers also found that the youth who progressed to a psychotic
disorder tended to do so relatively quickly. Twenty-two percent
developed psychosis within the first year of follow-up, an additional 11
percent by the end of the second year, and 3 percent more by
two-and-a-half years (adding up to the total percentage of people - 35
percent - who developed psychosis in this study).

"The message here is that once we identify people as being high risk, we
have a very good chance of knowing whether or not they're likely to
develop a serious mental disorder like schizophrenia and that, if they
do, it will happen fairly quickly. That's such a critical window of
opportunity for getting them the help they need," said Heinssen.

The investigators who conducted the study are part of a consortium of
nine research centers, the North American Prodromal Longitudinal Study
(NAPLS), whose goal is to improve the accuracy of predicting psychosis.
The consortium is funded by NIMH, which also provides administrative
leadership.

In addition to Cannon and Heinssen, NAPLS researchers who participated
in the research included Kristin Cadenhead, M.D., University of
California San Diego; Barbara Cornblatt, Ph.D., Zucker Hillside
Hospital; Scott W. Woods, M.D., Yale University; Jean Addington, Ph.D.,
University of Toronto; Elaine Walker, Ph.D., Emory University; Larry J.
Seidman, Ph.D., Harvard Medical School; Diana Perkins, M.D., University
of North Carolina; Ming Tsuang, M.D., University of California San
Diego; and Thomas McGlashan, M.D., Yale University.

The Staglin Foundation also provided support for the research.

For more information about schizophrenia, visit the NIMH web site at
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/schizophrenia/index.shtml.